Are England too beneficial to the Home Nations?

10 February, 2012 (08:19) | News For Football Clubs | By: admin


Earlier in the week, Nationwide’s 13 year contract with FA ended. It was the start of a new era with sponsors Vauxhall and with it, the rejuvenation of a long since dead Home Nations cup. Although the FA were quick to disregard reports that it would be a standard fixture, a one-off tournament can be on the cards. This improves the question as to whether England are extremely good for their neighbouring compatriots, as well as whether this is more a new sentimental move than one which would propel England into the potential.

England ranked 6th on earth (not sure how they got there thinking about a dismal World Pot and being a taught any lesson against the French) are usually 37 places ahead of his or her nearest home nations rival Northern Ireland. Going even more into FIFA’s latest rankings considers the Scots in 52nd and unbelievably even lower are generally Wales, who in 113th place, are generally behind the likes of Iraq along with Antigua and Barbuda (the latter of which I didn’t even know existed).

With regard to England to even be considering contesting each and every semi-final and final of the major international championship, they ought to be getting practice against the professionals of the world. I’m talking about Spain, South america, Argentina etc. Although England misplaced to France, they possibly have learnt a lot as compared to if they had played a new team not even qualifying to get a major tournament. Understandably, the FA may want to revive the competition for the tradition and maintaining connections using fellow football associations. However, it is surely more important that will friendlies and tournaments are to the benefit of the England national team against teams that could provide stern opposition. Zero disrespect to the other nations, but apart from the odd couple of players eg Gareth Bale & Aaron Ramsey for each team, Britain are favourites by a long-distance and would run out comfortable winners week in week out.

To make this a regular fixture would be absurd. Premier League managers are already worrying about fixture congestion, and unnecessary games would truly &*^* some of them off. It has furthermore already been argued that England need a winter break due to the domestic leagues, and just adding about more games would certainly cause further burnout. The best idea for this tournament is that it must be a 0ne-off marking its 150th house warming.

Moving back to the idea Great britain are too good for the Home nations, the proposed teams have never qualified for a major world-class in recent years. We have already noticed many a time when England have rolled over simple resistance, only to be slapped back into reality from a decent international side. This tournament would just become for me another set of qualifying rounds that sees England scoring plenty, yet creating a false sense of self-assurance and quality. England have to be tested in who they play, not attempting to please the fans by conquering the likes of Andorra 6-0 but then lose to the likes of Germany 4-1.

It will be pretty definite that The united kingdom may not take it seriously at all. The actual manager would be more willing to use the tournament like a training and scouting treatment, and thus as a preparation regarding following competitive fixtures. By doing so, it undermines the whole concept of a tournament where the best avid gamers are on show, and might quickly lose its reputation.

Home nations? One off, Of course. Regular tournament, NO.

Write a comment